Postmortem: Chicago Fire (1) at Vancouver Whitecaps (3)

Paolo Tornaghi upset

Cue the tear-jerking Italian opera music.

OTF’s Brian Howe Battle returns to review the Fire’s latest disappearing act…

After a string of June successes, Chicago’s playoff aspirations look less promising following a 3-1 embarrassment at the hands of the Vancouver Whitecaps last Sunday evening. After going unbeaten in six straight MLS contests, the team’s future must once again be called into question after two consecutive toothless losses to playoff-caliber teams.

The Fire played a strong (if spotty) first 45 and left the field at the half with what seemed like a chance to steal some points from the home side who, like Chicago, failed to capitalize on its goal-scoring opportunities.

It was a different story after the break though.

The ‘Caps stepped up their aggression and shelled a Fire defensive line that looked increasingly flimsy. A Goal-of-the-Week-worthy effort by Vancouver attacker Camilo Sanvezzo in the 66th minute opened the floodgates. Sanvezzo, a newly-minted all-star forward, netted another five minutes later, putting him ahead of Magic Mike in goals scored this season.

A frustrating game-sealer by substitute Kekutah Manneh made it 3-0 ‘Caps, and lefty Kenny Miller sprayed excellent chances while Vancouver pummeled Chicago into submission. Patrick Nyarko notched his second “junk time” goal of the season to cut the deficit to two in stoppage time, but the scoreline betrayed a sound beating for the Fire.

Criticism can be lobbed at many for the loss, but the story of the match was the atrocious Fire defense. The back four played a very high line during the first half, with both Bakary Soumare and Austin Berry intercepting long passes and bringing them back up into the attacking third. It was a positive development at the time, but a high work rate may have not been the best game plan for two centerbacks who were noticeably gassed after starting so many consecutive games the past two months.

With Gonzalo Segares suspended for yellow card accumulation, newcomer Shaun Francis complicated matters by being caught on the wrong end of the field during a number of counterattacks — a pattern that caused left winger Dilly Duka to track back for support and not push the agenda in Vancouver’s defensive half. Francis also had some possession and control difficulties throughout, and received what one might call a “posterization” on Camilo’s first goal.

Sorry Francis, but this ain't the USL. (photo: chicago-fire.com)

Sorry Francis, but this ain’t the USL. (photo: chicago-fire.com)

The Brazilian forward took down a long ball that was the taller Francis’s to give up. Camillo then cut inside towards goal past Francis (and a lazy Chris Rolfe challenge) and juked Chicago’s new left back on a fake left-footed effort before switching to his right, and zipped it past a visibly frustrated Paolo Tornaghi.

To be fair though, Francis hadn’t played a full match as a Fire defender yet — an excuse the rest of the back line (Jalil Anibaba, Berry, and Soumare) cannot make.

Berry, playing through what looked like a shoulder injury, volleyed multiple balls into his own goal’s line of fire. Soumare’s lackadaisical treatment of possession and distribution continues to unnerve, but most troubling is the shot that gave Camilo his second goal. “Individual” mistakes have been the culprit for many goals this year, but this was clearly a group meltdown — one the Fire couldn’t recover from even after an amazing first effort by Tornaghi kept out Camilo’s first attempt.

Anibaba didn’t have a terrible game, but his attacking skill leaves much to be desired. His crosses don’t seem to connect, and it’s obvious he’s not going to beat anyone one-on-one (see: Graham Zusi schooling him last Sunday). Perhaps most-discouraging though is that opponents have solved the riddle of the Anibaba-to-Berry throw-in at the corner of the 6-yard box. Nothing even close to a decent chance has come off this move in some time.

We don't care much for road games. And turf? Fuggedaboutit. (photo: chicago-fire.com)

We don’t care much for road games. And turf? Fuggedaboutit. (photo: chicago-fire.com)

But enough about the defensive end of things, let’s talk about the offense.

The Fire attack was, um… not good. Vancouver plays a 4-3-3, so there should have been more opportunities to attack from the flanks. Nyarko and Duka did have their moments in the game, but there were not enough approaches up the sides and too few balls were pushed to the byline.

It’s clear the Fire attack has ideas and creativity, but few have connected lately. Balls are continually put behind advancing teammates, back heels roll to no one in particular, and the group’s lack of size makes holding the ball up a Sisyphean task.

The first half showed some promise. An early Mike Magee cross was brought down by Chris Rolfe in the box, who showed good on-ball skills to bring it down and was able to pivot and strike, but the ball landed squarely in the hands of goalkeeper Brad Knighton — an occurrence all-too-common throughout the game. Magee put a similar lob into Rolfe early in the 2nd half that was headed over the crossbar.

The interplay between Rolfe and Magee is productive at times, but at 5’8” and 5’9″ respectively, the Fire clearly lacks a target man to compliment its mighty-mites. Maicon Santos has the physique and tools, but can’t be depended upon for consistent play. And the DP Dutchman who should be playing the role is more into selfies than soccer these days.

Without the suspended Daniel Paladini, Joel Lindpere came in and showed some promise with two late crosses — both of which could’ve been goals. Other positives were Alex’s defensive work rate and Quincy Amarikwa’s spark off the bench and knack for providing danger.

All-in-all, the Fire appeared to regress to pre-Magee form in this one. Particularly, Sunday’s performance resembled Chicago’s no-show against Chivas USA (also a Tornaghi start) — a game that was within reach and full of opportunities until a second half goal catalyzed a total defensive meltdown.

It’s a bit premature to declare their MLS campaign D.O.A., but it sure feels like the Men in Red are slipping. Unfortunately, their 2013 clock is ticking.

The window of opportunity to improve and bring in reinforcements during the transfer window is closing fast. Regardless, given the form and quality of the seven teams above them in the Eastern Conference table, it may already be too late to think about the playoffs.

OTF Contributor Brian Howe Battle is a Chicago local, expert cynic, and soccer nOOb. You can find his other soccer musings at the Owen Goal blog. Follow Brian @OwenGoal

5 thoughts on “Postmortem: Chicago Fire (1) at Vancouver Whitecaps (3)

  1. Rolfe really did have a horrible game. Really felt like two of his chances would have been goals at the feet of some other strikers in the league, and his seemingly half-hearted attempts at defending wound up costing us at least one goal. The guy is still in a funk, at a time when the club needs him to be at his best.

    As far as the back line goes, is it really asking too much of our back four to play most of every match? They certainly do look exhausted each week, but how often do most teams shuffle their defenders around? I ask the question seriously, not with any sarcasm. It seems like most squads play the same 4-5 players back there every game, but am I not paying close enough attention?

    • Re: your question, I don’t know the answer. What I do know is this though: if a guy’s tired, he’s tired. If he needs a break, he needs a break. And as we know, no one’s there to spell him.

      They need to pick up a CB and a RB. Anibaba’s not showing well at the moment, and Berry’s really on a downward spiral.

      Problem is, they’ve only got one international roster spot. If they unload MacDonald (transfer, trade, release), that’ll free up a second. But unless they’re willing to do an intraleague deal, there’s no way they get all three/four of the things they need: a #9, #10, a CB, and a RB.

    • Adam, good point on the back line … it’s usually not a part of the XI that you tinker with that much. It’s time to consider that our defensive failings might not be exhaustion, but a straight-up talent gap.

      • You can’t assume that until we actually see some rotation, which we haven’t. So I think it’s probably a little of both

  2. It’s really apparent now how much of our season was gambled on MacDonald having a career year, which was never going to happen.

    Very frustrating

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s